May/June Small-scale Metagame Report

Heya,

This is a new series of articles I’m beginning on this blog. Like most Vintage players out there, I mainly participate in small-scale tournaments. I get to one maybe two larger tournaments (33+ players) a year. Small tournaments are a different animal from large ones. You can often find outmoded archetypes such as Reanimator or Gob-Lines still being played, as well as oddball variants of proven archetypes like Tez featuring 4 Transmute Artifacts.

My goal is to track small-scale tournaments and report on their results. For the purposes of this blog, “small scale” means a minimum of 12 players and a maximum of 32. Stephen Menendian covers tournaments of 33+ players very well in his articles on Star City Games. I’m not going to infringe on his work there. I chose 12 as the minimum to ensure at least a third of the field is eliminated before cutting to the playoffs. Top 8 performance is important to me. Measuring how well a deck does against other well performing decks is key to gauging its power. Any less than 12 players and I feel you don’t even get a minimum feel of a deck’s competitiveness. Fortuitous pairings become too great a factor in which decks make the top 8.

I like small-scale tournaments because you can find some real innovation there. Players are much freer to experiment and try new decks without sacrificing their chance to top 8. Since many of us play in smaller tournaments, I feel this data will be useful. I also plan on examining various statistics and trends in this article series to further shed light on the metagame as a whole.

Before we begin, there are several caveats. First, if you don’t like the name I give a deck or archetype, that’s fine. You can tell me, but unless I made a significant error or there is some other compelling reason, don’t expect me to change or care. We can spend forever debating deck names. I’m not going to waste my time on it. Second, for this first article, I am getting all my info from Morphling.de. Starting with the next bi-monthly report, I’ll try to expand to other sites. This is purely for my own convenience this time around. Third, the number of decks reported might not add up to full top 8’s for the number of tournaments reported. Some tournaments are missing decks or only report the top 4. That’s just the way it is. So if the numbers don’t match, that’s why. Also, this is my first attempt. Mistakes are very possible. If you see one, please, point it out and I will fix it. Finally, the numbers will only be current as of this writing. Tournament reports might come in after I finish writing my report. Not my fault; I’m sorry if your tournament didn’t get included. I will try to wait at least a few weeks after a two-month period has ended before writing.

I’m going to break down the results in several different ways. First is by top 8 finishes according to deck archetype in no particular order:

Tez......................................... 35
Stax......................................... 5
Elves!...................................... 2
Mono-U Control.................... 1
Landstill .................................2
Euro-Control......................... 5
Ichorid.................................. 16
Mono-Red Shop Agro.......... 2
Control Slaver....................... 4
Bazaar Drain.dec.................. 1
Painter................................... 5
WUG Fish.............................. 3
UW Fish................................. 1
MUD...................................... 5
BUG Fish............................... 6
Helm of the Void Combo..... 1
TMWA.................................. 2
UG Fish feat Bazaar............ 2
Mono-U Shop Agro............. 1
La bulle à Bonvil.................. 1
Suicide Black........................ 2
Drain Tendrils..................... 2
Drain Freeze........................ 1
ANT...................................... 1
TPS..................................... 12
Bomberman........................ 3
Goblins................................. 1
Hellkite Oath...................... 3
Zoo....................................... 1
Remora Control................. 3
Counter-Top...................... 1
Grow................................... 4
Long.dec............................. 1
Selkie Strike...................... 1
WUB Fish........................... 3
Pitch Long......................... 1
Progenitus Oath............... 1
Grim Long......................... 1
GW Beatz.......................... 1
UR Fish............................. 2
Stifle-Nought.................... 1
WGB Fish.......................... 2
RBW Fish.......................... 1
BRG Fish........................... 1

Analysis: Tez is by far and away the most likely deck archetype to make the top 8. 35 Tez decks made the playoffs, which is over double the next archetype- Ichorid. Speaking of Ichorid, though, it made a very strong showing as well IMHO. 16 out of 150 reported decks made the top 8. That’s not bad at all.

I believe the reason Tez decks did so well is, obviously, that it is the best deck in Vintage, period. I’ve heard all the arguments about percentage of the field, player preference, player quality, and so on. I wave my hand at them. Tez is best (or at least was until the B/R update). End of discussion. As for Ichorid, I believe its strength in these small-scale tourneys comes partly from poorly prepared sideboards. It’s been my experience that players at smaller tournaments play with more versatile sideboards, and this makes sense. You will face a much broader ranger of threats in small tournaments than you will in larger ones- especially in the top 8. However, considering how easy it is to include cards like Leyline of the Void, Tormod’s Crypt, Relic of Progenitus, and Yxilid Jailer into a sideboard, Ichorid’s strong performance in reaching the top 8 is somewhat likely due to inadequate sideboard construction in the field. Note I said “in the field.” The next set of data is much more telling about how the best decks perform against each other.

It’s one thing to make the top 8, it’s another to win. You can see the brilliant diversity of the small scale meta above, however the tournament winners are less varied. In no particular order, here is who won the May-June small tournaments this year:

Tez................................... 8
Euro-Control.................. 1
Ichorid............................ 1
Control Slaver................ 1
BUG Fish........................ 1
TMWA............................ 1
UR Fish........................... 1
Mono-U Shop Agro....... 1
TPS................................. 1
Bomberman................... 1
GW Beatz....................... 1
RBW Fish....................... 1
MUD............................... 1

Analysis: Only one deck archetype won more than one tournament in this bi-monthly report: Tez. In fact, close to 1 out of every 4 Tez decks that made the top 8 won. (For most of the bi-monthly period it was running at 1 to 4, but some last minute European tournament reports added some fish winners) That’s pretty strong. Out of the 20 tournaments reported as of this writing, Tez won 40% of them. That is an astounding number when you consider the number of diverse threats that deck must face, overcome, and win against to take home the top prize. Ichorid, however, only won 1 tournament. This shows me that in general, players in small-scale tournaments are unprepared for Dredge decks. However, once you get to the top 8, decks are well defended against that strategy. So in short, Tez and Ichorid appear to be your top two choices to make the top 8 of a small-scale tournament, but Tez is (was) your best choice to win.

I’ve debated on whether or not to split Ichorid decks into Mana’d and Manaless. I wouldn’t mind some feedback on that. Is it fair to lump all Dredge decks together while not doing the same for all Fish decks? I don’t know. I’m not sure the two builds are all that dissimilar from each other. However, lumping them together might not give the clearest picture of what’s going on. Some advice on this matter would be most appreciated.

Let’s move on to how each “Pillar” did in this cycle. Several weeks ago Tom LaPille outlined the DCI’s view of Vintage. He stated there are five pillars of the format that they track and try to balance against one another. They are: Force of Will, Mishra’s Workshop, Bazaar of Baghdad, Dark Ritual, and Null Rod. Force of Will decks were later refined to mean mainly FoW decks that feature Mana Drain. So, according to pillar (Drain, Shop, Bazaar, Ritual, Rod), here is how they stacked up:


..................Top 8's.....Wins
Mana Drain....64.............11
Workshop.......14..............2
Bazaar..........19..............1
Null Rod.........25..............5
Dark Ritual....20..............1
Other...........14..............0

Note: The “other” category includes things like Oath decks that didn’t use Mana Drain, various creature decks like Elves and Goblins, and some Grow variants. Some decks utilized more than one pillar in their build, so a total of 6 decks were counted twice.

Analysis: Drain decks made up 41% of the top 8’s and 55% of tournament winners in May and June. That is domination on an unheard of level. Such performance would never be tolerated in any other format by players or the DCI. Coming in second was Null Rod decks at 16% of top 8’s and 25% of tournament winners. This is where the conundrum of Ichorid decks comes in. Above I recommended Ichorid decks based on their performance as a deck archetype. However, as a pillar Rods beat Bazaars both in wins and top 8’s. So which is right? Well, Rod decks are immensely diverse in their builds. In fact, I counted 12 different archetypes that played Null Rod. Conversely, there were only three Bazaar archetypes. Pick your poison, I suppose, their both vastly inferior to Drains. Surprisingly, to me at least, Ritual decks faired very poorly in this bi-monthly report. Only one Ritual deck won a tournament (TPS). I don’t know if it’s a sign that there’s a bias against combo decks in smaller tournaments or if Drain decks are just that dominant. Perhaps my next set of statistics will shed some light on that as more data sets come in.

For years, there have been three main strategies identified in Magic- Combo, Control, and Agro. Examining these strategies can be an important part of understanding the over-all metagame. These categories organize decks in to their major point of emphasis and can give insight into their general game plan. Since they were identified, hybrid categories like Agro-Control and Combo-Control have been identified. For the purposes of this blog entry, I’m going to stick to the original three. I realize that’s not ideal, and I might change that in the future since decks like Grow are extremely hard to categorize as one or the other. But I want to go from micro (deck archetypes) to macro (strategy) in my analysis of the small scale meta, and sticking with the original three helps me best accomplish that goal. In no particular order the three strategies finished like so:


...............Top 8's....Wins
Control........75............11
Combo........22.............2
Agro............53.............7

Analysis: No decks were repeated. Control finished with 50% of the top 8 metagame and 55% of the winners. Agro came in second with 35.3 % of the top 8 and 35% of the winners. Combo entered last at a 14.7% share of the top 8 and a 10 winning percentage. Rounding may account for numerical discrepancies.

What does this tell us? Control decks are dominating and at the same time not knocking each other out of qualifying for the top 8. This is a direct result of Mana Drain’s strength. This data may show that combo decks aren’t favored by small tournament players, but I think it’s too early to jump to that conclusion. Time will tell. Agro decks aren’t too far behind Control; not surprising in a smaller tournament scene. We’ll see if newer printings affect this at all. As far as card choices, this data tells us that things like 9Sphere, Ethersworn Canonist, Pyrostatic Pillar, and Gaddok Teeg are likely at a low ebb in power while cards like Nulll Rod, Gorilla Shaman, Chalice of the Void, and Red Blasts are probably at a peak. This is speaking only in a broad sense. Individual small-scale metas are comprised of the personalities that play in them and will, therefore, be unique. There’s no blanket statement that can apply to all of them.

Overall Analysis:

Drain deck, specifically Tez decks are powerfully dominant in small-scale metagames just as they are in larger tournaments. The metagame is basically broken down into Control Decks vs. Agro Decks with Control holding the upper hand at the moment. Combo decks are scarce right now and not performing well when they do show up. This data should provide us with a baseline to judge the modifications to the B/R List on June 20, 2009. Starting with the next bi-montly report, we’ll know if those changes made a difference or not.

The Top 5’s:

Along with my deck analysis of the metagame, I want to analyze card choices. There are six categories I plan to look at every two months. They are: Top 5 Cards Played, Top 5 Creatures, Top 5 Artifacts, Top 5 Lands, Top 5 Spells, and Top 5 non-P9 Restricted Cards. The numbers I use are accurate as of this writing and come from Morphling.de. These numbers include ALL tournaments- big and small.

Overall Top 5 Cards for May/June 2009:

...............................May June Total
Force of Will...............388....332...720
Polluted Delta.............293....262...555
Underground Sea........226....208...434
Mana Drain...............211....204...415
Flooded Strand...........210...191....401

Top 5 Creatures for May/June 2009:

................................May June Total
Yixlid Jailer.................126....125.....251
Dark Confidant............116.....125....241
Tarmogoyf..................97.......77.....174
Golgari Grave-Troll.......80.......NA.....80
Narcomoeba................79.......NA......79

Top 5 Artifacts for May/June 2009:

...............................May June Total
Pithing Needle............171....121.....292
Chalice of the Void......170....98......268
Tormod's Crypt..........143....116.....259
Black Lotus...............127...106.....233
Mox Sapphire.............112...103.....215

Top 5 Lands for May/June 2009:

..............................May June Total
Polluted Delta............293....262.....555
Underground Sea........226....208....434
Flooded Strand...........210....191.....401
Wasteland.................201....149.....350
Volcanic Island...........84......99.......183

Top 5 Spells for May/June 2009:

...................................May June Total
Force of Will..................388....332....720
Mana Drain....................211.....204...415
Duress..........................224.....175....399
Thirst for Knowledge........178......175....353
Leyline of the Void...........154.....133....287

Top 5 Restricted Cards Outside the P9 for May/June 2009:

................................May June Total
Demonic Tutor.............95.......87......182
Sol Ring......................94.......86......180
Brainstorm..................91.......83.......174
Mana Crypt.................91.......82.......173
Vamp Tutor.................84.......82.......166

I think looking at these lists can give us some insight into building sideboards and including specific hate cards to combat the most prevalent cards played in the meta. I’ll track the changes every two months, and we’ll see how the meta evolves as we go.

Closing:

I hope that this article was enjoyable. If you play in small-scale tournaments, I hope it’s useful. Until next time,

Peace,

-Troy

Sources:

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1048
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1049
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1052
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1056
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1060
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1062
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1066
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1067
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1068
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1069
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1073
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1074
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1075
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1077
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1078
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1081
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1083
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1088
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1089
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1090
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1092